A lot of Linux enthusiasts argue/claim that Slackware Linux is an outdated and obsolete Linux distro.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgDCzZWeaiSjJe4wklF4BOZtx4QFoCiXq3roNUB-BT6PgEWUbDzMhwAr2cHqmNQyKdMT26ClrAFuZjJPaXYvwf7WNRB753Vx90yibU0djZqTfrgm8HjgPYhI_PaZHmVUJtZ_Gsgh9kdlO1ztxGZ6XXrHxj6zvxuCjcoReMa7P3xU_X4wgB7XaqrFkrNWA/s320/53508e371b3966d793277e7a2974d88e.jpg)
Fair enough, if compared to more modern bleeding-edge distributions like Ubuntu, SuSe, Gentoo and the like.
Allthough Slackware is a vanilla-distro (little or no changes/patches to system packages what-so-ever), it can be TWEAKED to include whatever you'd like. It is one of the last "hands-on" distributions out there. ANYTHING can be hacked/tweaked to suit any needs.
Slack forces the user to learn Linux from the ground up, and by this learning-curve, makes the user able to do whatever on whatever distribution in question. However, there are custom-distro's that focuses on specific user-scenarios: Ubuntu serves as a good "out-of-the-box" operating system for "gnubies", Fedora is Red Hat-based and serves as a rock-solid server framework or a good place to start as a sysadmin, SuSe is very good at security and Gentoo for compilation-wizards and optimization-gurus.
But since Slackware is the oldschool-type, it is basically barebones.., it is the base, and it works!
Patrick Volkerding is the maintainer and "BDFL" of Slackware Linux.
The three S' o' Slack:
- Simplicity
- Stability
- Security
0 kommentarer :
Post a Comment